Last summer
I had a argument conversation with a family member who is the
typical gun-totten, freedom-lovin’ ‘Merican that has come to personify the
American Right. We don’t always see eye-to-eye, as we are essentially polar
opposites, but he is family and has always been there for me when I needed him
(typically arriving 20 minutes late, but still… eventually he’s there).
Basically the conversation was about our diets impact on the environment - he
categorically and instantly argued that fishermen are catching record levels of
fish, as an indication that the world’s oceans are perfectly healthy.
The oceans
are currently stressed from the amount of fishing and unfortunately, farmed
fish are no better of a choice, and come with their own host of problems
(discussed in Part II). Today our global fish population is experiencing
something of a crisis - and the idea that our oceans are inexhaustible can no
longer go unnoticed.
Beginning
in the mid-20th century, international efforts to increase the
availability and affordability of protein-rich foods led to concerted
government efforts to increase fishing capacity. Favorable policies and
government subsides spawned a rapid rise of big industrial fishing operations.
Another
figure to help demonstrate this point is the total number of fish we bring in.
According to international law, when fish are brought to port, fishermen are
required to report their catches; and various organizations have kept track of
these numbers since the 1960s. Since the ’90s, the total number of fish caught
globally has leveled out. In 1989, 90 million metric tons of fish were taken
from the ocean, representing a high-water mark. We have maxed out the ocean’s
ability to produce since then.
According
to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), of the
600 marine fish stocks they monitor, 52% have been fully exploited and all of
the 17 primary fishing stocks worldwide are either overexploited or on the
verge of collapse. In 2003, a report announced that industrial fishing had
reduced the number of large ocean fish to just 10% of their pre-industrial
population. Examples of this collapse are the Grand Banks near Newfoundland and
the Georges Banks of New England, both once considered the most productive
fishing grounds on the planet, and both now nearly devoid of life.
While still
hotly debated, many scientists are now supporting the theory that if current
practices continue, all of the world’s fisheries could collapse by 2048.
Another
indication of stress in the ocean is the average trophic level of fish caught
throughout the globe. Harking back to high school biology class, a trophic
level is the position in the food chain for a particular species. If a fish
eats algae, it’s at the first tropic level. If it’s a carnivore that eats
smaller fish, then it’s one level up and so it continues up to the largest
predators in the oceans. Because the higher trophic-level fish, such as
swordfish or tuna, bring in such large profits (some tuna sell for over $1
million dollars!) these are the preferred fish for fishermen. However, as their
populations have declined, they’ve become more difficult to catch. The result
is that fishermen have moved down the trophic-level. These fish have less value
per pound but are currently more available than the higher trophic-level fish.
The impact
of this is that we are now literally scraping the bottom of the ocean floors
for whatever is left. Having to move down on the trophic-level is a dramatic
indication that we have fished beyond sustainable levels.
Besides
reducing the populations of the fish fisherman actually want to catch, we have
also had a negative impact on less desirable species. Due to a process known as
by-catch- fish unintentionally caught- many species have become endangered
simply because we want to eat other fish. Sharks and more
surprisingly seagulls have been large victims of this wasteful practice. Feel
free to google image this. The images are too depressing for me to put up.
Finally,
bottom trawling is, perhaps, the worst of all fishing practices. Basically,
fisherman drag nets across the bottom of the ocean floor and gather everything
in their wake. At the surface, they discard as much as 70% of what they pull up
– all of it dead. It is a common practice used when shrimping.
Unfortunately, the
giant marlin that Santiago wrestled in Hemingway's "The Old
Man and Sea" is becoming increasingly rare, and some day may only be found
in the imagination of fiction. These issues about our environment and
ecology need to be part of the public discourse. We need to face these hard
truths if a true solution is to be found.
Additional Reading:
http://www.mindbodygreen.com/0-11561/9-things-everyone-should-know-about-farmed-fish.html.
“Overfishing: Plenty of Fish in
the Sea? Not Always.” National
Geographic.
Ivan Macfadyen, “The Ocean is
Broken.” http://www.theherald.com.au/story/1848433/the-ocean-is-broken/
Pauly, D., et all. “Towards
sustainability in world fishers,” Nature
2002.
General Situation of World
Fish Stocks, United Nations Food Agriculture Organization (FAO)
Harrington, J.R., et all.,
“Wasted Fishery Resources: Discarded By-Catch in the USA.” Fish and Fisheries 6.
Janicke Nordgreen, et all.,
“Thermonociception in fish: Effect of two different doses of morphine on
thermal threshold and post-test behavior in goldfish.”Elsevier
Rosamond L. Naylor, et all.,
“Effect of Aquaculture on World Fish Supplies,” Nature Vol. 405, June, 2000.
Oppenlander, Richard. Food Choice and Sustainability: Why Buying
Local, Eating Less Meat, and Taking Baby Steps Won’t Work. New York,
Langdon Street Press, 2013.
As always the information presented in this blog is for educational purposes only. It should not be considered as specific medical, nutritional, lifestyle, or other health-related advice.
Thanks for not including the images, as they are indeed awful. It's so interesting how it never occurs to people how barbaric and wasteful such practices of using animals for food on such a grand scale have become; we are a world of gluttony, waste, and little compassion.
ReplyDelete